Suppose, just for purposes of entertainment, a hunter was beneath the tree on the left side of the picture shown above. Suppose he is shooting at a particularly delicious looking woodchuck on the right side of the picture, depicted by a white ellipse with cross-hairs sketched on it.
Furthermore, suppose there is a couple nearby who is otherwise distracted and some blunt obstacles near the path of the bullet.
Knowing that the sound of gunshots is distracting and sometimes generates more attention than desired, the hunter has a suppressor mounted on his weapon.
|Same image posted for convenience.|
|We have all had the experience of hearing an airplane and then not being able to find the source of the noise. We are looking behind the current location of the plane.|
Experience from poachers suggests that observers are very rarely able to identify the position of the first shot. Like on the sporting field, the first infraction only gets people's attention. It is the second infraction that gets flagged.
|The smaller, dotted line suggests the wave-front of the echo shortly after the original sonic boom hits the parked van.|
- The origin of the first shot is unlikely to be accurately identified by observers even in the absence of a suppressor.
- Location of the origin of subsequent shots will be incorrectly identified by observers when a suppressor is used due to the dynamics of sonic booms.
- Location of the origin of subsequent shots will assuredly be incorrectly identified by observers when a suppressor is used when there are blunt, reflective masses in the field-of-play. This is particularly true if the blunt, reflective mass could, conceivably hold the shooter.