Texas state Rep. James Talarico is the Democratic candidate for Senator for the Great State of Texas.
He made the statement "God is non-binary," which might be true in a narrow, mathematical sense since:
IF
God > Man
God > Woman
God > Man + Woman
THEN
God cannot be (just) a man
God cannot be (just) a woman
God does not fall into the narrow definitions of "Binary genders"
THEREFORE
God must be non-binary.
For the non-Christians
Traditional Christians believe that God revealed himself to us through three different faces or persona, the way a single, gifted actor might play three roles in a small theater production. One of those persona identifies as The Father. This persona is fully shared with the Jews.
The Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) of the New Testament introduces and fully develops The Son and introduces The Holy Spirit.
The books after the four Gospels goes a long way toward developing the character of The Holy Spirit.
One God. Presented as three different people (by God's choice) to make God's "face" more comprehensible to flawed and limited humans. This is vaguely like Star Trek splitting the complexity-of-command into Captain Kirk, Spock and Dr McCoy: Action, Intellect, Empathy.
However...
If you accept the Bible as the word of God, then God self-identifies in multiple verses as "Father" and "Son", both of which 100% and unambiguously identified as "male" at the time the Bible was recorded.
So Talarico, in an attempt to appease one constituency managed to offend Traditional Christians AND (if they bother to think about it) the "I am whatever I choose to identify as today" crowd.
I understand that many people today had horrible experiences with their father or their mother's boyfriends. They may have been raised by abusive, alcoholic, mentally-ill men...shortcomings which can also be shared by mothers.
I get that many people were raised in families without any "father figure".
But as some level, even they understand that when Satan is prowling around our campfire, we want Simba by our side, not the opportunistic and morally "flexible" Scar.
Jung was onto something with his ideas about archtypes. Archtypes might be hardwired into our brains at a DNA level. They run deeper and truer and more swiftly than intellectual parlor games.