This post is the start of something new.
I intend to discuss one "Heuristic" each Monday until I lose interest.
For those who have not stubbed their toe on the word "Heuristic", a heuristic is a mental shortcut. We use them to reduce cognitive burden so we can think about, and pay attention to other things.
A simple example of a heuristic nearly all of us have used is "You can remove your foot from the brake pedal and press on the accelerator when the traffic light turns green"
The actual "rule" is "You may proceed after the light turns green, the intersection is clear and it is safe to proceed". Very important if you are not the first vehicle in line.
Heuristic: Adjustments and Anchoring aka First Impressions
When confronted with a novel situation, we typically assess the incoming stream of observations and information. Then after we have a "sample", we form a preliminary or operating assumption. As life moves on, we continue to receive information. Some of that information supports our preliminary assumption. Some data will be contrary to that preliminary assumption.
Research universally supports that we always over-weight our initial mental model and almost never modify that model to the degree that math suggests is appropriate.
The reason is that we use our initial model as a filter. We are bombarded with information. Consider how many conversations going on in the background of a busy restaurant and yet your mind effortlessly ignores them! That is because you have a heuristic running in the background that the only the people at your desk or table are important.
The First Impressions heuristic functions the same way. It tosses information that is not coherent with your mental model (This salesman has integrity, this house is a good structure, the sports teams I follow are superior to other sports teams) discards contrary information as "noise" just like you filter out side conversations.
If it helps, the First Impressions heuristic is like a weir over a water inlet that filters out sticks and trash that is not in alignment with the wires but lets straight sticks that are in alignment in.
Stupid, smart, wise
Stupid people form snap judgements based on small or inherently biased samples of information. The idea of a small sample is self-explanatory. The inherently biased sample is a little trickier. For example, you might base your house buying decision based on a large sample of data but all of that data might be from real estate brokers.
Smart people (at least with regard to this heuristic) will make a concerted effort to research a topic from several different sources. They will tread water until they have a model that stops wobbling with each new bit of information.
Wise people will move between the two. Some "wrong" decisions don't come with a high cost. Other times, our mental models offer such low predictive capability that there is little sense in investing in them. I suggest that choosing politicians because "I think he is an honest man" while thinking it will predict how he will vote is one of those low cases.
Wise people also understand that there are times when the consequences are so dire that any decision is better than a delayed decisions. "One foot on the dock and the other in the canoe" is the classic case. Wise people make an effort to avoid analysis-paralysis.
When you are trying to influence the decision maker
This heuristic is very frustrating to somebody who is attempting to influence a decision maker.
Consider the person who emails their boss some article or tidbit that contradicts the boss's decision. Over the course of six months they send 20 such articles and academic papers. Then after confronting their boss to seal-the-deal, they are devastated to learn that the boss cannot remember reading a single one.
The way to drill through the "First Impressions" filter is to overwhelm it.
But don't use just any kind of data. Use overwhelming amounts of VIVID data. Real people are vivid. Video is vivid. Color is vivid.
In one case an engineer changed a fog-lamp mounting system because she videoed what happened when a car (hers) exited a steep driveway (at the facility that provided daycare for her children). It lunched the foglamps. The video captured the crunch. She stopped the vehicle and the video captured the broken glass. The video also captured the fact that she was moving at a very cautious speed.
The fog-lamp mounting system, the one she had been trying for months to have changed by sending lab test results (not quite acceptable) to management, the one that they had adamantly refused to change because of cost...was changed. The management team needed all of 20 seconds after viewing the video to reach that decision.
Precision vs Accuracy. We are very precise these days. Accuracy is dependent on that 'garbage in' issue.ReplyDelete
You have illustrated me to a T. Thank you. I made a decision long years ago as a teenager. I refused anything that did not validate that decision. Until something VIVID came along 40 years later that allowed me to see, that overwhelmed my bias, that replaced my mental model. This explanation made that clear. And I crave clarity.ReplyDelete
I think this is a different subject, but my head wants to conflate the two. I understood my early life as a template. One that allowed me to ignore what fit as 'normal', and only take note of what didn't fit as needing more scrutiny. I figured that's how you can drive for miles without really remembering it. Template was running. I read a story about how a I guy's aunt had a rattlesnake shaped ashtray he saw every time he visited. Twenty years later, on a hike, he saw that exact ashtray in a ruined cabin. As he reached for it, it struck at him. Ashtray became SNAKE!!!! His template almost got him bit.
Just another angle on heuristics, I guess.
Glad I could be of service.Delete