Wednesday, April 28, 2021

6.5mm Arisaka and Limpet mines

The 6.5mm Arisaka or 6.5mm Japanese is an interesting cartridge for a few reasons.

It was introduced in 1899 and the bolt action rifle that fired it was state-of-the-art for its time.

Unsure of their metallurgy abilities, the Japanese took a design similar to the German Mauser and doubled the number of locking lugs from two primary to four primary lugs. With a +30" barrel it made a fine spear after mounting the bayonet on it.

At some point in WWII the Japanese decided that the 6.5mm round did not have enough killing power and introduced a second infantry round that was very similar to the British .303. Those darned Americans were way-hard to kill.

In retrospect, declining marksmanship was probably more of an issue than lack of killing power.

The US had a similar issue in the Korean War when the .30 Carbine gained full-auto capability and the round that mowed down Japanese Bushido warriors couldn't kill Chinese. Kids, freaking out when the Chinese attacked in waves went full auto and most of the rounds went high, smacking into the hill two klicks downrange.

The bullet that misses has no killing power unless you count the ones that land in Miss Susie's 4th birthday party across town.

Ballistics:

6.5mm Arisaka, 120 grain softpoint, about 2500 fps

6.5mm Grendel, 120 grain softpoint, about 2400 fps

6.8mm Remington SPC, 115 grain softpoint, about 2500 fps

The 6.5mm Grendel and 6.8mm SPC are very new chamberings intended to maximize downrange energy .AND. still fit in an AR-15 envelope.

In WWII, the 6.5mm Arisaka was more typically loaded with 160 grain FMJ bullets at 2200-to-2300 fps.

Reloading

The 6.5mm Arisaka is not a SAAMI defined round. The "official" max pressure is 42,000 psi which is probably a nod to the same, conservative decisions made by the Japanese in 1899.

By way of comparison, the .243 Winchester has a SAAMI max pressure of 60,000 psi. The reason that the .243 Winchester is used for comparison is that some reloaders use .243 brass as the starting point and re-form it into 6.5 Arisaka brass.

Chambers

The exigencies of war result in excessive variation in components. Dirt, mud and other debris can prevent a firearm from going into battery.

To deal with the issue, the Japanese "grew" the diameter of the chamber. A machine can run if it is "too loose" but it will not run if it is "too tight".

The generous chamber dimensions mean that brass life for the 6.5mm Arisaka is short for those of us who reload. The brass gets a work-out between expanding when fired and being cranked back down when full-length formed. One option, if you will only be shooting the round through a single rifle, is to resize just the neck.

Limpet mines

The British engaged in a crash program to create weapons as WWII loomed over the horizon.

One of those weapons was the limpet mine, so named because it resembles a clam that adheres to structures like the hulls of ships that are moored.

Necessity is a mother.

The original plan called for specialty magnets but the Brits went with common, horse-shoe magnets because that was what was readily available.

Two major problems that had to be solved involved a robust timing mechanism and how to initiate that start of that mechanism.

Batteries are heavy. Salt water is both corrosive and conductive.

The solution was to separate the two contacts (or the hammer of a percussion igniter) with a small candy called "aniseed ball". The sugar-based candy dissolves at a very repeatable rate in cold water and worked just fine....

EXCEPT

It started dissolving the second the frogman stepped into the water. Since frogmen are expensive and time consuming to train, Brits deemed it advisable to recycle them rather than sending them on one-time missions.

The solution was to encase the aniseed balls with a condom which the frogman stripped off the mechanism just before he swam away.

The jokes write themselves.

Nevertheless, I admire the fact that the Brits were able to field an effective weapon for less than a billion dollars in development costs.

"Brits discover that condoms delay premature events involving aniseed balls" or something like that.

7 comments:

  1. I remember reading that in post WW2 testing the US Army determined that the early war 6.5 mm Arisaka was the strongest action of all the combatants but that article did not mention the number of locking lugs. Nice to know.

    Opie Odd

    ReplyDelete
  2. They didn't think it was lacking in power for stoping people, it was not powerful enough to stop airplanes and light ship and vehicle armor. If you're going to make a new MG cartridge, you might as well make rifles that chamber it as well. And if your rifle shoots your fancy new plane killing cartridge, it should probably have AA sights so everyone can shoot down planes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, they should have probably rechambered them for the .45 ACP, a proven anti-aircraft round.

      https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/this-pilot-shot-down-an-enemy-fighter-with-his-1911/

      Maybe they should have copied the sights, too.

      Delete
  3. When first brought back ammo for them was scarce. Many had the chamber reamed out to 257 Roberts which was stretched out to 6.5mm. Known as the 6.5-257, it was a pretty decent round. The Arisaka we had was awfully "rattlie".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Quick bomb development. Lewes bomb.
    A very good read is SAS - Rogue Heroes by Ben Macintyre.
    It describes the invention of the Lewes Bomb. Development costs were probably very low because all materials would be dtolen.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Obviously, that last word shoulf be "stolen".
    Condoms still find lots of uses. One over the rifle muzzle means no delay in firing while it is removed but keeps the environment out.
    Some defence procurement girl is probably impressed by the number of condoms the "serving" men use.

    ReplyDelete

Readers who are willing to comment make this a better blog. Civil dialog is a valuable thing.