|55 grain soft point penetration, 2700fps impact velocity|
Terminal ballistics is the science, some would say art, of what happens after the bullet hits the target.
The Law Enforcement community suffered a traumatic event when the FBI had a shoot-out with some bad guys in 1986 in Miami. The ammo used by the FBI was the best available according to the anecdotal evidence of the day. It did not live up to expectations.
That led to an effort to quantify, in a testable way, what law enforcement required from the terminal ballistics of issued ammunition.
Two key words that often get missed are the words "law enforcement".
For example, the FBI determined that issued ammo had to be able to defeat various barriers like plywood and automobile windshields. They also determined that it needed to penetrate a minimum of 12" of soft flesh.
Why are those "requirements" less likely to apply to Joe Lunchbucket defending his home?
The incident that precipitated the review involved a team of law enforcement officials in a fire-fight with the bad guys. Some of the team pinned the bad-guys down while others of the team maneuvered to get a clear shot. That "clear shot" involved penetrating intervening barriers and the projectiles did not have enough energy left to incapacitate the bad guys.
As a civilian it would be a rare event where you are shooting at targets behind barriers. For one thing the barrier could be obscuring other, innocent people. For another, that barrier muddies up the claim that your human target is an imminent threat to you or yours unless you are trying to shoot through a windshield and hit a driver attempting to run you down. An aggressive prosecutor will claim that you should have been putting distance between you and the threat rather than shooting back.
The 12" rule is another "requirement" that applies more to law enforcement than to the civilian.
The specific circumstance that led to the 12" rule is that the bad-guy was shooting at the cop when the cop's bullet hit the bad-guy in the forearm. The bullet passed through about 6" of meat, went out the other side, flew through air and then hit the bad-guy in the chest.
After that, the bad-guy was not an aggressor and he went on to expire six minutes later from internal bleeding.
The after-action-report speculated that it is possible for a motivated aggressor to continue the fight even after the forearm of one of his shooting arms has been destroyed.
|Image from The Visual Human Project|
The other place where 12" or more of penetration is warranted involves shots that hit the bad guy in the hip. Lots of muscle to penetrate and big bones to break. Shattering those bones is a show stopper. Hits here, sometimes called Yankee heart-shots, might be useful in a firefight where the bad guy took shelter behind a vehicle but are of marginal utility to the civilian home owner.
Why the angst over the 12" rule?
So you might be asking yourself, "Why is ERJ so exercised over the 12" rule? Today there are dozens and dozens of projectiles that meet the FBI criteria."
That is true for handgun cartridges of 9mm and higher. It is much less true for smaller and higher velocity cartridges like the 5.56X45mm NATO round.
|Almost meets FBI penetration requirement with 11.5" of penetration with an impact velocity of 2900fps.|
It is my personal opinion that the typical home owner who chooses a modern sporting arm for home protection is better served buying fifteen boxes of ammo that ALMOST meets the 12" rule than to buy 6 boxes of ammo that does.
|Meets FBI requirements but at 2.5X the price.|
Running 200 rounds through the firearm also give you a fighting chance to pick up the muscle memory to run the firearm without being slowed down by the need to check the manual when things go bump in the night.
Like every other opinion on the internet, this opinion is worth exactly what you paid for it.
Interesting lessons learned from that fight. First, if PLatt had immediately left the fight from his first wounds and gone to a hospital, he would probably have died from blood loss. He continued the fight for another six minutes. Second, the fight was ended with a .357 revolver, firing (probably) the old FBI .38 special rounds.ReplyDelete
But, the simple fact is that bullets are better today than they were in 1986, and the FBI shootout had a lot to do with that. The bullet manufacturers started paying attention and have given us much better ammo than anything that was available on 1986. Even budget ammo today is better than waht the FBI was using at that time.
+1 on Pawpaw.ReplyDelete
Plus, of course, the terrible tactics used by the FBI didn't help the outcome. Yes, it's armchair quarterbacking, but the tactics used were poor, at best.ReplyDelete
PawPaw is correct, however.....bullets and ammo today are much more effective than they were then because of the research done by the FBI research due to that debacle. (but really, it was an attempt to whitewash the agents actions). From that research we got the 10MM, which most agents couldn't handle....