Sunday, May 16, 2021

Tar and Feathers

 

I worked one summer of my misspent youth on a roofing crew. We roofed flat roofs with tar and stone.

The "kettle-man" ran the kettle. He broke up 100 pound plugs of tar with an ax and tossed them into the propane fired kettle.

It was pumped to the roof and "hot" guys carried it in buckets to the skilled guys who poured and mopped it. Gravel was added later.

I was a "hot" guy.

One morning we lost our kettle-man. He always started early...four in the morning if memory serves...because the crew had a temperature window to work with. The tar had to be hot and liquid when we showed up.

Because he started early he also punched out early and a kettle that is 1/4 comes to heat more quickly than one that is full. So a big part of his job, early in the shift is to refill the kettle, never adding so much that it dropped the temperature below the working temperature of 450F.

Unlike ice which expands when it freezes, tar shrinks. It shrinks a lot. So every plug of tar had a deep cavity in the top.

One night it rained. In the morning, the kettle-man did as he always did. At some point, when the kettle was almost full, he tossed in a piece of tar from the top of one of the plugs. It still had some water in the cavity....perhaps the recess in the top had partially "bubbled". I don't know. I never saw the kettle-man again to ask.

The water flashed to steam and sprayed the kettle-man with molten, 450 degree liquid tar which immediately congealed upon hitting his skin. The kettle-man was a big man. It was hot near the kettle. He was not wearing a shirt (but he was wearing sunglasses).

The Emergency Room physicians resorted to using a hand-cleanser, GoJo, to soften and remove the tar. A eighth-of-an-inch of slagged on tar burned equally deeply into his flesh. 

Everywhere he was splashed, except for the spider webs, were third (and fourth) degree burns.

  • First-degree burns damage the outer layer (epidermis) of the skin. These burns usually heal on their own within a week. A common example is a sunburn.
  • Second-degree burns damage not only the outer layer but also the layer beneath it (dermis). These burns might need a skin graft—natural or artificial skin to cover and protect the body while it heals—and they may leave a scar.
  • Third-degree burns damage or completely destroy both layers of skin including hair follicles and sweat glands and damage underlying tissues. These burns always require skin grafts.
  • Fourth degree burns extend into fat, fifth degree burns into muscle, and sixth degree burns to bone.    Source

 Modern medicine is a miracle. It can save nearly every person who has less than 40% of their skin covered with third degree burns. The first hospital stay is long, 20-to-40 days. The treatment is excruciating as the patient is put into a whirlpool for "debridement". Debridement is when the dead and infected flesh is removed by the water and mechanical scouring.

In the absence of modern antibiotics, sterile whirlpools and an economy rich enough to subsidize putting a person into intensive care for a month....burn patients with 40% of their body surface covered with 3rd degree burns are going to die a very, very painful and protracted death. Many will opt for suicide.

The lucky ones are the ones who die quickly. They will be unable to replace fluids or their electrolytes will get out-of-balance and they will tag-out with a heart attack. They will die within days. Still excruciating pain, but only days of it.

The unlucky ones will linger for weeks, and then die.

Back-in-the-day, to be tarred-and-feathered was not a joke and almost inevitably fatal.

If you survived (unlikely), you would have horrible scars and everybody would know, "You were the guy..."

Not a joke

Today, the term "tar-and-feather' is something of a joke, a meme or shorthand for taking action against somebody who you disapprove of.

It is not a joke. It is a death sentence.

And it is telling that at various times in our country's history people felt it was not just justified, but required.


15 comments:

  1. what the history books leave out is that after giving the victim a head start the mob chased after him with torches. if they caught him he was set on fire. how much head start was determined by how angry the mob was.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was a kettle guy for a summer. It's even worse if you are working with coal tar; the fumes will burn you, too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was a laborer for a roofing company for a short time. An old American Indian named Smitty was the kettle man. We roofed with coal tar, and Smitty's skin was a testament to the sulfur content in the pitch. His skin was like sunburnt lunar surface skin. Awful. No one else was allowed anywhere near the kettle, and if the wind was from the wrong way, and the elevator downwind of the kettle, us slag shovellers got our USRDA approved minimum of sulfur.

    For the to-be-tarred-and-feathered, I wonder how they were treated while the tar was heating up. That takes a good little while.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I always wondered about that. Now I know. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  5. I always wondered about that. Now I know. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  6. Back in the day the ‘tar’ in ‘tar and feathers’ was not the petroleum based tar used in roofing, it was pine tar, it was a brown, very sticky, liquid used to preserve the rigging on sailing ships. So, back then, to be tar and feathered was to be doused with this liquid and then covered in feathers - very embarrassing, and hard to clean off, but not fatal. Pine tar was my Finnish ancestors cash crop, and when the age of sail ended in the mid 1800s they left Finland and emigrated to North America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. That was my impression. Pitch.

      Delete
    2. https://allthingsliberty.com/2013/12/5-myths-tarring-feathering/

      Delete
    3. I too, thought that it was a different tar. I just didn't know the differences.

      Delete
  7. Back in the day the ‘tar’ in ‘tar and feathers’ was not the petroleum based tar used in roofing, it was pine tar, it was a brown, very sticky, liquid used to preserve the rigging on sailing ships. So, back then, to be tar and feathered was to be doused with this liquid and then covered in feathers - very embarrassing, and hard to clean off, but not fatal. Pine tar was my Finnish ancestors cash crop, and when the age of sail ended in the mid 1800s they left Finland and emigrated to North America.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I remember the scene in "John Adams" where John Hancock and others were applying the tar and feathers.
    In looking for that scene, I found:
    https://www.nysun.com/arts/bring-forth-the-tar-and-feathers/72671/
    "One historian who examined the subject recently, Alfred Young, found that there were only three individuals subject to "full-scale tar and featherings in Boston in the revolutionary era," and that "In Boston, Whig leaders" — of whom Hancock and both Adamses were certainly at the forefront — "invariably were hostile to tar-and-feathering; they tried to rescue the victims.""

    ReplyDelete
  9. I also remember seeing the Ford Rotunda burn to the ground due to a roofing tar accident.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Albertasaurus, yes, precisely what I think of when Tarring & Feathering are brought up. Before the late 1800's petroleum asphalt was not commonly found, and then only in naturally occurring oil seeps and tar pits.

    I wouldn't advocate ERJ's version on anyone, but let's say one could set something up for an appropriate occasion - say, a press conference, live TV - where a nicely timed dousing of thickened corn syrup, followed by a overhead release dump of chicken feathers...for the rewards of ridicule and scorn, no injury required, except maybe to pride and pomposity.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I couldn't possibly comment on the suitability of certain public figures and government officials as candidates fully deserving of this process, whether using pine tar or petroleum derived tar.

    ReplyDelete

Readers who are willing to comment make this a better blog. Civil dialog is a valuable thing.