Monday, January 31, 2022

A math problem

 Ian Ion, spaceman, discovered a large gold nugget on the moon where gravity is 1/6 that of earth. The nugget has a mass, on the moon, of 1/6th of a kg. A kg of gold has a value of $60,000 on Earth.

What is the gold nugget worth?

18 comments:

  1. probably a massive negative - given the cost of transport to get it back to the earth

    ReplyDelete
  2. Like everything else, it is worth what someone will pay you yo part with it. On the moon there ate few buyers, consequently in place (on the moon) it is worth nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Welp... you wrote "mass" as opposed to "weight" soooo... on Earth the weight of the nugget will be 1/6th of a kilogram thus having a value of $10,000.

    Da Perfessor

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mass is mass anywhere. That is why the metric system is so useful.
    $10,000

    ReplyDelete
  5. More than it's worth to transport it... :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. If that gold nugget were on earth, it would be worth $10,000.
    The nugget is actually worth $10,000 minus whatever it costs to transport it back to earth (IanJ appears to have been first to answer)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just at a loose end today. I suppose an accountant might try to work out the marginal cost of carrying it on an existing flight - that could make it quite cheap, but I don't know how much extra fuel would be needed for getting into orbit/re-entry

      Delete
    2. and I forgot to include 'rarity' value - Didn't some moon rock sell for a small fortune on **-bay

      Delete
  7. Methinks your audience falls outside the normal bell curve distribution, Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mass is mass, irrespective of the local gravitational field. If the nugget was on earth, it would be worth $10,000 in mineral value. As others have pointed out, however, there is additional value in it being a scarce moon nugget and there are transportation costs but presumably our spaceman is returning home anyway, so the incremental transportation cost is probably negligible.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Da Perfessor was the first person to respond with the answer I was fishing for.

    We commonly interchange "weight" and "mass" because weighing something in a know gravity is the most economical way to determine something's mass.

    ReplyDelete
  10. $60k of course.
    The window dressing makes it hard to see for some.

    ReplyDelete

Readers who are willing to comment make this a better blog. Civil dialog is a valuable thing.