I read blog posts and get emails that trash the "vaccines" because they are not FDA approved, therefore they are not real, safe "vaccines".
I think folks are missing the point.
The FDA gatekeepers only exist to create post-retirement sinecures. Really, at this point, what value do they add? They were MIA when we needed them, so what good are they?
Let the drug companies self-validate that they met the protocols and eliminate the FDA. Pink-slip the 18,000 employees (and countless contractors) associated with the FDA.
If they are half as smart as they tell us they are, they can learn to code.
That would be fine I think he usual case where the vaccine manufacturers have not been granted blanket immunity from liability for their defective and dangerous product. Here, we have neither FDA bureaucratic hoops (even the manufacturers call that stuff experimental gene therapies in their filings, not vaccines, usable only in a state of emergency) nor financial consequences for the thousands of deaths, much less non-fatal physical disabilities, to incentivize manufacturers to provide a safe product. In that case, what does a rational drug maker/dealer do? Heck, kill ‘em all, let God sort ‘em out. Oh, and make sure the ones who live need boosters every few months. It maximizes shareholder value, which is all that matters to those vultures.
ReplyDeleteI've seen enough class action lawsuits for injuries and death from FDA approved drugs to know I don't want a shot. I Remember when the head of the FDA was replaced when I was in fourth grade.. And it was either a lobbyist or former VP of a pharmaceutical company. I was well aware of the drugs that were coming up for approval and the consequences for the company should they fail. It's not like that any more...
ReplyDeleteAs mentioned above, there are alot I'd problems with the current set of shots. I'm with you in preferring the FDA be eliminated, but in that case there would need to be a robust method to sue companies for faulty products.
ReplyDeleteIn this case, federal law has distorted the market and what is essentially propaganda has magnified both the problem and the proposed solution our of proportion.
The FDA is not the answer, but there are loads of questions. Get back to us in 20 years, tell us about the long term effects you've seen.
ReplyDeleteAny regular medicine or treatment advertised on tv has a long list of side effects up to death. Aren't similar warnings missing with the not vaccine? With corona deaths if you were tested positive 30 days before death it is covid caused. How about any deaths 3 days after shot? Or 48hrs? Up to 11,000 deaths so far.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
460,000 reports entered into Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. CDC website.
Say they paid each family $25,000 for giving something that killed the patient. $275,000,000 so far.
What about the 50 or so Texas democrats who were fully vaccinated, got sick with symptom's, tested positive and made people on Nancy Pelosi's staff get sick and test positive? Over 10% failure rate for vaccine. They only reason to get vaccinated is because of the pressure from your job, friends or family and keep the peace.
While I agree that the present FDA (spit!) and CDC (spit, again!) (where's some road apples I can chew on, to get that taste out of my mouth?) are, presently, less than useless, I cite Thalidomide as an argument that we do, indeed, require an organization of ethical professionals to oversee and question our pharmaceutical industry.
ReplyDeleteSadly, as the often cited line from Iowahawk goes,
"David Burge
@iowahawkblog
1. Identify a respected institution.
2. kill it.
3. gut it.
4. wear its carcass as a skin suit, while demanding respect.#lefties
9:39 AM - Nov 10, 2015
Dr. Fauxi as a prominent exemplar.