So if a man can have a little surgery and some hits of estrogen and compete as a woman in swimming, can he also compete if:
- The entrance to his windpipe is routed to the back of his head so he does not need to turn his head to breath
- The top of his skull is streamlined like a duck's bill
- His thighs and shins shortened
- His knees made to bend both ways
- His ankles turned downward 90 degrees
- His metatarsals split apart and extended with bone taken from his thighs
- Toes extended with finger bones. He has ten fingers, surely he doesn't need that many
- Flesh and skin stretched to give him webbed feet
- Shoulder blades pulled inward, upper ribs and clavicle shortened to taper upper body
- Fatty tissue moved around to create a torpedo shape
Photoshop mock-up of the changes. Projected swimming speed of 12 miles per hour |
Universal Basic Income
If UBI is implemented, does that mean that men will no longer need to make child-support payments?
Her voice is not what I expected
Jackie Evancho singing a song written by her uncle, Matthew Evancho; To Believe
Miss Evancho was about 11 when this was recorded.
And from the vaults
Not a message you hear today. I wonder why.
Trial run?
According to Trent Telenko on Twitter, much of Russia's failure to execute in Ukraine can be laid at the feet of poor logistical support. That, in turn, is due to problems with tires, equipment uptime, gaps in leadership and motivational issues of drivers.
Systemic failure occured when the tattered supply chain was unable to sustain the tempo of the line and the operational demands beat the few, functioning bits to pieces. Russian forces were unable to press their initial advantage and dislodge Ukrainian forces that are peppering their troops and equipment.
Before we cheer "Yeah Team West!" we should pause and look at the domestic supply chain. We are seeing shortages of repair parts. The leadership in both Canada and the US seem to be targeting drivers and mechanics and favoring consumers and snowflakes. Diesel prices are bankrupting operators.
My philosophy is that the best way to stay up-beat and positive is to take positive actions. For example, one failure of the Russians is that they are shipping raw potatoes and turnips to the front-lines. That is inefficient in terms of space utilization and it pulls fighters off the line because the rations are not ready-to-eat.
Look around your area-of-operation. Are there local materials that you can use instead of purchased materials shipped in from China? Are there any items that are still readily available that are space efficient and easy to prepare? Dried spaghetti, for instance, is rapidly prepared and very compact compared to almost every other food. Vegetable oils and other shortening, ditto.
The new Tic-Tok challenge
Slap-a-Celeb
If you cannot find a certified Celeb in your area, you can video yourself slapping a passive-aggressive or an influencer-wannabe or a snowflake.
You only get one free slap, so make it count.
Rice comes to mind. Lots of protein there, stores well and is dense.
ReplyDeleteBeans take a bit longer but are more calorie dense than either rice or pasta.
I think the Will Smith show is just that, all show or stunt. They crave attention. So they got it. Men slap when they do not want to permanently damage their target. All show. And like other Hollywood productions a bad example of behavior.
ReplyDeleteExactly.
DeleteName one thing out of hollyweird that is not scripted?
They are playing everybody, and think they are so smart. What better way to prop up sagging ratings? Have a bunch of actors act! You're a fool if you think that stunt was real.
Here's betting the United States doesn't have near the number of shells, missiles, etc. to wage a similar war for a similar duration. Nor the capacity to make more in a reasonable time.
ReplyDeleteThe US used to have the "Iron Mountain" intended for when the Cold War went hot. My understanding is that much of it was used in Iraq and Afghanistan over 20 years.
DeleteI suspect the US still has large amounts of military supplies - I think the challenge will be getting it where it is needed, which will require ships the US no longer has.
ERJ, as I have considered what (from all reports) seems to be a failure in Russian logistics, the one thing I am NOT hoping for is that there is any lesson learning going on from this in the Russian military - but I fear there is. This would mean that the next time around (I am assuming there will be a next time), in theory at least the same mistakes would not be made.
ReplyDelete1) When I was working, our company made a gizmo that was supposed to be on every USN vessel. I would get a call from someplace in the world from a harried O-2 on getting the gizmo repaired so their vessel could go and do what the Navy wanted it to do. There were allegedly 10 gizmos in stock at the depot to cover the transition but in the 18 years I handled this product, there was never even one.
ReplyDelete2) The Soviets and now Russians never made a large number replacement parts, say for tanks or aircraft. When you broke a tank, you got a new one. They did not recover and fix the old ones. When ships or aircraft broke down it might be months before a critical spare could be manufactured and shipped.
I don't know about the other services, but in my career speciality in the Air Force, for the mission critical radar, we had a spare parts section that carried at least one of any module that might possibly go bad. We also had a maintenance section that could repair most things. Of course, this was in the 70's and we still used mostly tubes.
DeleteI was lucky enough to attend a seminar by an engineer from McDonald-Douglas "back in the day". He was trying to hire Electrical Engineers.
DeleteHe said everybody got the same airframe but the electronics packages and software varied wildly. He said one of the hardest things for new engineers was to wrap their minds around the limited part-sets they were allowed to use in their designs. Need a choke for a surge protector...you might have two choices. You figure out how to package it. Same for fuses and relays and so on.
The presenter said that keeping the parts inventory manageable was the reason for the very sparse list of parts that were allowed in new designs.
Look at the B-52. Seventy years old and not looking too bad for an old girl. C-130, KC-135, U-2, AC-47, F-4 and the F-14 all have a lot of years on them.
F-4's used to fly on our radar site, as did C-130's for ECM training. The F-4's also did simulated bomb runs. The C-130 is still flying today. The F-4's, not so much. On a clear day, you could "see" an F-4 before you could actually see the airplane because of the smoke trail from it's engines.
DeleteAs far as the BUFF, it will still be flying 100 years after it's maiden flight. I just read where they are getting new engine upgrades.
Too bad the F-14's got bone yarded out by the FA-18.