Friday, December 27, 2024

An Exit Ramp from Compulsory Education

An exit ramp from compulsory education

John Wilder raised the following point in his recent essay Is the Bottom 20% Killing America?

Eliminating those disruptive “students” would allow the rest of the students to learn....and if the kid is booted from school, lift child labor laws and allow them to work 40 hours.

But what would we have them DO????

It doesn't matter what they do! One crew could be digging holes and a different crew could be filling them in the next day and it would still be a net-gain over the current system.


It doesn't matter if equipment could do it cheaper.  The benefit comes from getting them off the railroad tracks so the trains can run.

 

Children with mental illness who think they are animals can be given jobs that are consistent with their delusions.

The educational detour doesn't need to be permanent. There can be a "losers bracket" similar to what is seen in double-elimination tournaments.

Rust, rot and entropy ensure that there is always work that needs to be done. There might not be "jobs", but there is always paint that needs to be slapped onto structures, piles of wood that need to be stacked, invasive species that need to be chopped down, trees that need to be planted and so on.

If nothing else, they can be put onto exercise bikes and used to generate electricity or pump water.

24 comments:

  1. Let them wash parts and help out at a mechanic shop, work with a welder, plumber, clean up a machine shop ,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And that used to be the method of finding employment for folks that were just not able to do other jobs. Dishwashers, broom pushers, etc. Every shop floor had a guy like that.

      But then some do-gooders decided that businesses were "Exploiting" these people for low pay and benefits, and put a stop to that.

      Delete
  2. I went to China in 2008 for a work trip, and saw this in action. There was a diagonal line of at least a dozen men with push brooms sweeping the street, each man pushing the dirt a little closer to the curb than the man to his left got.
    Even after we send all the not-Americans back, we’ll still have plenty of, shall we say, “welfare-inclined” folks who should have a task to keep them busy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agree whole heartedly. Its STUPID to expend vast resources to bring the bottom 5% up a small amount (that still amounts to useless at a societal level), at the expense of not funding the top 5% to the same degree. Look at all the drooling wheelchairs running around in specialized vans, and 5 aides per 3 'clients' (as if Corky or his parents are footing the bill!)
    The idea that those resources are better spent making a few peoples lives better was born when females started dominating schools and HR. Its a very maternalistic notion to focus on the bottom, whereas males tend to focus on the top.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr Wilder's point is more along the lines of the average +/- 0.7 STDev being cheated out of an education because the problem-kids are slam-dancing in class and it is hard to do a titration when you have Cletus smashing into you.

      Average +/- 0.7STDev (IQs 90-110) are 50% of the population and are the meat-and-potatoes of the work-force.

      Delete
  4. My bride did a stint as an 'emergency-certified' math teacher, providing supplemental math instruction to 8th graders. It did not take her long to begin fantasizing about pulling a .44 and blowing away miscreants in her class. She was adamant that if they would just let the teachers refer about 10% (I think she was low on her assessment) of the students to an 'idiot class', that she could have made some significant strides in advancing the others, but... 'muh diversity', and all that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why reward them with sand-boxes and cuddle toys? More than half of their problems are behavior.

      Have them tossing bales of hay, picking cucumbers, picking potato bugs.

      Delete
  5. I went to catholic school and we didnt have much in the way of disruption by students, but that was the 50's and 60's. If you were being a jerk, your folks got told to straighten him out, we've got a
    waiting list to fill that place. That society doesnt exist anymore. Very few of the kids I knew came from single parent homes, maybe 5%. I whole heartedly agree taking the unteachable out of the schools would make a better environment for those who remained but its politically unobtainable. Additionally, I dont think a large percentage of the kids that need to be excluded will ever be productive members of society but leaving the door open for return has merit. Some kids will settle down at a later date.

    ReplyDelete
  6. We saw this along with bad teachers way back in the '90's-2000's. We pulled our kids from public indoctrination and home schooled them. And for the naysayers, yeah, it turned out terrible. One became a firefighter, the other a pediatric oncology nurse. (sarc off)

    ReplyDelete
  7. My son was sitting at a table in his classroom when the "class animal" decided to jump up onto the table and start pulling my son's hair, as in, trying to pull my son out of his chair and up onto the table. This shaved ape was KNOWN to ALL for this kind of behavior. And NO, he WASN'T black! The class animal was literally that; an animal. He was also on my son's Little League team. He would pick up handfuls of gravel in the dugout, put it them in his mouth, and then blow them out all over the other kids sitting on the bench. Then he would climb the backstop, start shaking the thing back and forth, screaming his head off. That kind of thing. Anyhow, back at the classroom, a fight ensued, after which both the animal and my son were suspended for two weeks. My son had a STELLAR behavior record and STELLAR grades. Suspension was not going to happen if I had anything to say about it. My wife and I went 'round and 'round with the teacher, to the point where she called in the principal. The teacher's final... and fatal... volley was "All the kids in the class have the right to learn!" I retorted with "Yeah. ALL the kids have the right to learn, but it seems like this one lunatic kid is the only one who gets to choose whether or not he, or anyone else, gets to exercise that right. What about the REST of the class??? What about MY son???" ...Crickets... My son was back in class the next day.

    The class animal didn't belong in "special ed." He belonged in an INSTITUTION! I wouldn't doubt that he ended up on death row...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pretty sure (not positive) it's still not OK to euthanize those "special" critters.
      After I got out of the military in '73, I wanted to be King and square shit away. Gonna have to put several thousand on trial, then public executions.
      As I got older and wiser, I figured out, I didn't want that job after all. I don't LIKE people enough to have that much interaction with them. Incidentally, that's God's job, so, above my pay level.
      Maybe the pendulum with bring back public shaming, if that doesn't work, shunning. Yeah, I mellowed out. Live and let die...with love.

      Delete
  8. The problem with "labor-saving" solutions is it leaves those laborers nothing to do except collect welfare. Eliminate "minimum wage" and provide more labor-intensive jobs. Go "green"; use people with shovels instead of bulldozers ...

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Conservation Corps did some good work. That could be 'reintroduced' as a place for those disrupters.

    ReplyDelete
  10. DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, man. Glad to see you are still alive.

      Out of curiosity, does the comment x 261 refer to the post, the comments, mosquitoes or to the problem-students?

      Delete
    2. ERJ, only you would count that. What would the psychologists say.

      Delete
    3. Perhaps he/she would say "Go forth and multiply"

      Delete
  11. As horrific as it might be to say Adolf Hitler wasn't being just evil when he implemented his "eugenics" programs. A small subset of humanity is quite simply of zero use. They are a parasitic burden to everyone else. The tough question is how to deal with that reality. Hitler's mistake along those lines was expanding that program to include groups he didn't like. People who were capable and functional but who he didn't approve of. But screaming and shouting "HITLER...You're as evil as he was" doesn't change the fact that a significant...and expanding portion of humanity is nonfunctional. And I'm not sure a pleasant solution to that reality exists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The experiences with students my wife has been having teaching college kids what amounts to basic math - or trying to - perhaps leads to the latest headline: "Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy ignite feud inside MAGA movement with latest proposals" in which they suggest allowing skilled foreigners in because Americans are stupid, retarded, or whatever term they used. Many - most? - of today's college graduates are simply not capable of advanced skilled work nor capable of performing basic tasks as employees. I read of many companies not even wishing to hire recent graduates. Children of the "everyone gets a trophy" generation and now the after-effects.

      Delete
    2. Proof that the DoE worked as intended. The whole goal is to eliminate the American Idea. And it has worked.

      Delete
  12. The kids are disruptive because they don't have at least one active parent, exacerbated by the 'kids learn to socialize from other kids' attitude.
    Instead of condemning millions of kids to a nasty life, how about we tackle the root cause?
    The amount of money spent genuinely helping orphaned and abused kids is less than we spend on pet food. No one really cares. We'll feel bad for a while and then get on with our lives. Or maybe we'll put them in labor camps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope I can agree without being disagreeable.

      Many kids are disruptive because their parent(s) throw them over the fence and say "Their behavior in school is the teacher's problem. Their behavior on the street is the cop's problem." but many is not ALL.

      Some of these kids had their brains scrambled while they were in their mother's wombs: Alcohol, weed, hard-drugs, lead, bad genes. Their brains are broken or they develop at a much slower pace.

      I have to call BS on the pet-food claim. According to Captitaloneshopping, we spend an average of about $5 a day for each pet dog in the US and 1/3 of that is for food..let's say $2/day. Cost for in-patient care for a disorder like bipolar runs about $700 a day. So the cash burn-rate for a patient being treated for bipolar disorder is the same as the cost of feeding 350 dogs.

      It isn't about "punishing" the disruptive kids. It is about saving the other 23 kids in the classroom.

      Delete
    2. It doesn't help that any parent holding their kids accountable and punishing them for misbehaving will eventually run afoul of the State. You can't spank kids...you will be arrested for assault. Lock your kid in their room to punish them....go to jail for false imprisonment. When you can't discipline a child it doesn't take long fpr the child to take advantage of that fact. All part of the lefts plan....

      Delete
  13. Kansas did it, before there were telephones. And “our generation” Princeton grads had trouble passing the 8th grade Finals.

    MF
    We’re in a heap of trouble.

    ReplyDelete

Readers who are willing to comment make this a better blog. Civil dialog is a valuable thing.