Sunday, February 4, 2024

The ultimate weapon is what resides between our ears

My mother (Constance Helmericks) told me stories of these people (Native Alaskans). There was an old man who had never owned a rifle. He caught seals with a hand-made net under the ice. He was eaten by a polar bear.

Another old man had an ancient, single-shot .22 rifle to hunt grizzly bear with. He would lie on his stomach on the tundra in the path of a browsing bear and move his hand to imitate ground squirrels.   -Jean Aspen

Let me preface my comments by stating that there is a 10%-to-20% chance that one of these stories is an exaggeration. Native-Americans have been know to string Europeans along.

Polar bears hunt seals. That is what they eat. Anything on the ice other than a larger polar bear is dinner. The first Alaskan native was putting himself in harm's way every time he went on the ice and triple-so when he was near seal air-holes. He did this knowing the risk because he had to feed his family.

The second Native Alaskan was using his body as bait. He was flipping and swishing his hand like the rapid stop-and-flit of a ground-squirrel, one of the grizzly bear's favorite foods. He was probably behind the top of a rock-pile where ground-squirrels like to nest. He waited until the bear was SO CLOSE that he could not miss hitting him in the skull where he knew the bone was thin and the brain was close beneath...say from a distance of ten or twenty feet.

Contrary to popular belief, grizzly on the the tundra "barrens" do not grow very quickly. Food is scarce and of poor quality. Hibernation is long and the season when food is readily available is short. A ten-year-old interior/tundra grizzly might only tip the scales at 350-to-400 pounds. Pretty much 2X Dick Butkas with regard to size and attitude and sporting ten, 3" long claws and jaws that dwarf a pitbull's.

The point is that some men will step-up and do whatever it takes to feed and protect their family. It might only be one-man-in-five or one-man-in-fifty. But we are out there. Depriving men of technology will not stop us.

The first example was hunting 200 pound seals on the arctic ice under the noses of polar bears with a net woven from whatever fibers he could find (1940s!). The other was assassinating 400 pound grizzly bears with a gun most modern sportsmen would consider inadequate for any game larger than raccoon.

Remember 9/11?

The attackers used weapons (passenger aircraft) supplied by the US to attack iconic landmarks. We did not even recognize aircraft as weapons before the attack.

Rabid Progressive might be able to make conventional chemical propellants and commercially manufactured ammunition illegal or unobtainum, but it will not make a difference. The people they oppress will improvise, adapt and overcome.

For example, every fully-charged battery in this picture contains 65% of the energy in a Claymore mine.

That is right. The lithium-ion batteries on these puppies can hold 900,000 Joules of energy and TNT tops out at 4000 J/gram.

From the Progressive perspective, the most compelling reason to NOT go all-electric is that the batteries are the equivalent of blocks of C4 scattered on the street, free for the taking.

Admittedly, petroleum fuels are even more concentrated but they must be intimately mixed with air and contained to produce an explosion. Air being 3/4 nitrogen dilutes the effect. The energy in the batteries is separated by only a few thousands of an inch of permeable membrane. It does not take a lot of heat and/or "rapid mixing" to cause an explosion.

12 comments:

  1. "Air being 3/4 nitrogen dilutes the effect"

    Can you say FAE?

    Jest sayin

    ReplyDelete
  2. As you say, the Mind is the Weapon, the stuff in the physical world are mere methods. "He killed them with a pencil, a f****ing pencil!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Everything besides your brain is a tool. Restricting access to some tools won't stop the man with a good brain.
    For example, don't forget the largest mass murder in the US was committed with $1 in gasoline and a couple pieces of chain.
    Virtually any aircraft can be disabled with an awl or screwdriver in the right place.
    And so on and so on.
    J

    ReplyDelete
  4. And achieving the result can be far more important than your life. --ken

    ReplyDelete
  5. The issue with batteries as bombs is they simply don't release that energy fast enough to do enough damage when compared to an explosive. They contain a lot of energy, but it cannot be released in milliseconds. Thus they make really crappy bombs.
    They do work pretty well as a means to start a big fire. Once you get a lithium battery burning it's near impossible to put it out till all that energy is dissipated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ANFO is also a mechanical mixture with the same problem. "Rapid and vigorous mixing" resolves the problem for ANFO.

      Delete
    2. Yes...ANFO doesn't deflagrate at the same speed as a higher order explosive. But it releases it's energy much faster than any battery.

      Delete
  6. If you want to know about rapid energy transitions, obtain an old Merck Index. Do not search for one on line, that's a trigger.

    ReplyDelete
  7. My son ran with a wild fire crew years ago. Two crews were talking at a rest camp hanging out waiting to see if a flare up required continued services. The one crew of Alaska natives from an interior village was telling about an elder who dug a spider hole on the edge of a trail and harvested grizzlies with a .22 pistol as they walked above him! The world record grizzly (skull dimensions) was harvested by a native lady in northern Canada with .22 longs and was documented by the local trading post operator! I also had an old timer who came to alaska in the late 1920’s tell me about harvesting moose with a .22 when times were tough. Sneak attack to put one round in the lungs on a bedded moose and sit quiet until it collapsed!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I watched that GarandThumb video where he "proved" that .22 long was lethal (to a human, probably eventually) out to beyond the range it could accurately hit anything (>500 yards). it's always been an underestimated round.

    ReplyDelete
  9. One of the most successful elephant cartridges was 6.5 Mannlicher. Round nose, moderate velocity, high sectional density....it didn't shatter on impact, and didn't track off with a deformed nose. Actually .22lr is also a proven elephant killer....in the artery behind the foreleg. Statistically, an arrow is deadlier than a bullet. So much wisdom for the seeker, rather than knowledge....

    ReplyDelete
  10. I purchased a small quantity of those Aquila SSS 60 grain bulleted rounds for possible close range - big game opportunities where penetration is a large factor in success. Because the heavy bullet normally requires a fast twist 1:9 to stabilize the extreme length of bullet, it will normally keyhole fairly quickly (< 25 yards is often cited). But for ambush sites with closer shots, I think it will do. Deer - feral hog, that sort of thing.

    ReplyDelete

Readers who are willing to comment make this a better blog. Civil dialog is a valuable thing.