There was a term for a certain-kind-of-girl in my youth. Locally it was something like "Richard-tease" but in other parts of the world it was something like "Rooster-tease".
Her mode-of-operation was to find some guy(s) who was(were) desperate for physical affection. She would offer and expose and promise and let him get close, oh, ever-so-close.
And then she would jerk it away.
Again and again and again and again.
The rube(s) were driven to the point of insanity. And then past that point.
It is similar to using a dog's "ball-drive" as a reward in training. Stuff some peanut butter in the Kong. Tie a rope to it. Let him mouth it and wrestle against the rope and get excited. Then yank it way from him and put it on a high shelf where he could not reach it...but can still see and smell it. The dog will sell-his-soul to get that Kong.
Yeah, just like training Fido using "ball-drive". Amazing parallels in the language, no?
I watch the quarterly made-for-TV drama of progressives promising to "...cancel student debt..." and cannot help but think, "She is a Richard-tease and she is doing it now". She knows it. I know it. Every man over the age of 35 knows it. And still the rubes loose their minds.
If student debt was ever going to be cancelled it would have happened by now. It is pure kabuki theater.
It begs the question "What do the progressives intend to do with their inflamed-past-the-point-of-insanity 25-through-35 year-old Fidos?" If those intentions were good, noble and worthy they would not need to resort to such dehumanizing means.
Lucy has a very high need for control and is just plain mean. She cannot stand to see other succeed and actively sabotages them. She is the archetype progressive |
Words can be powerful. Lets use them. Progressives are Richard-teases...or something like that.
They lose their power after they are properly identified. The rubes realize that the Richard-tease will never consummate the rubes' desires. It is a game to the Richard-tease, a trifling with affections.
An even better one I heard was just call them pedophiles.
ReplyDeleteDon't engage in debate as to why, just repeat it over and over. Pedophile. Shut up you pedophile. Go vote for Disney pedo. Talk to Epstein lately pedophile? Hows Ghislane doing, I know you pedophiles all stick together....
Heads literally explode in seconds.
Calling them pedophiles might gain traction with people who are already conservatives but might alienate most independents.
Delete"If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck: It is a duck"
There is enough evidence that The Squad is a bunch of Richard-teases and that speaks to the 25-to-35 year olds in a way they can understand.
The Progressives are the party that enables and monetizes pedophilia but I don't think MOST of them actively engage in it. Most meaning "More than half".
One would hope that the talk of reparations is kabuki theater also, though in California they appear to be attempting to move ahead with reparations. The talk currently is centering on how to pay out reparations, some sort of scale of payments based on what? The number of whip scars on one's back?
ReplyDeleteOne city in CA is essentially paying reparations to LGBT with the UBI system for them only.
DeleteThe government can established a cap on pay out dollars per individuals. They must submit a DNA test showing percentage of African and that's the percentage of the dollar amount they will receive. But they also have to prove that great granny was an actual slave. Just because great granny was a slave in Cuba and then came here doesn't mean that the US is going to pony up any money. Go talk to Cuba. I am totally against any reparations because it won't stop with them. Next up will be the Japanese that were interred and lost their profession, money and housing. And then the Irish cause they were discriminated against when they came here. And the list goes on.
DeleteOf course they have to tease, because they can't deliver on their promises - it's physically and economically impossible, which also means they constantly have to find new supporters and new people to blame for not delivering on their promises. Hence their cycle of new victim classes and throwing the old ones under the bus.
ReplyDelete