Friday, July 24, 2015

Obamacare: A Rhetorical Question

Taking the Democratic talking points at face value, that Obamacare is a huge leap forward in accessibility to quality medical care and is an unmitigated success:

Why has there been no effort, on the part of the Democrats, to extend those benefits to other professional services....most notably legal services?

At this point it must be noted that Congress and the White House are populated by attorneys, not doctors.

So why aren't attorneys eager to have their billing statements subject to review, revision and write-down by clerks, who might have an Associate's Degree?  Could it be the possibility of unilateral write-downs of as much as 90% for "services"?  Could it be a pride thing....  Or more likely the fact that review by conscientious clerks will reveal instances of (gasp) fraudulent billings; double billings, billings for services not rendered, billings that are "rounded-up".

Inquiring minds want to know.  Democrats treating ObamaLegalCare like the proverbial third-rail is de facto proof that they acknowledge Obama(medical)care as an abject failure or an admission of pervasive fraudulent legal billings by their practicing associates.  Which?

3 comments:

  1. Having watched a liar, er... 'lawyer' bill about 30 hours on a five hour flight, I'd LOVE to see it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DID (Dissociative Identity Disorder) he?

      Delete
  2. Having watched a liar, er... 'lawyer' bill about 30 hours on a five hour flight, I'd LOVE to see it...

    ReplyDelete