Frequent commenter Dan wrote the following comment on the post about the 4B movement:
How convenient for the insane lefties to advertise their insanity so we can more easily identify and avoid them. And I've seen it said that if these whack jobs actually possessed the self control to refrain from sex for four whole years then the issue of abortion would be a NON issue. (Underline for emphasis is mine)
Mr Dan, it is not my intention to be argumentative, but let me lay out the reason(s) why I think they can control their sexual behaviors.
I believe that nearly all women would decline the chance to jump into the sack with "Dumber". The phrase "Not if he was the last man left alive." springs to mind.
So the switch-in-the-tracks has been universally misidentified as "willpower".
Women seem to possess an infinite amount of willpower when a relationship the "dude" will lower the woman's social standing. The dude has a negative Social Standing Multiplier.
If Elon Musk or Robert Downey, Jr offered, many/most women would probably accept the offer because both men still offer a significant, positive SSMs.
If somebody within the woman's social sphere offered, then the SSM those men offer is not large enough to compensate for the loss of social-standing the women got from their 4B virtue signaling.
After enough time passes, nobody will be paying attention to the posturing because it became "stale" and passed its sell-by date. The social-multiplier from 4B will have faded away. At that point, when Chad winks at them they will be receptive. Heck, even Napoleon will have a chance.
I know this post will totally piss-off some feminists. "Nobody is THAT crass" they will trumpet...however, that degree of "crassness" seems to dominate on the negative SSM side of the scale. Just ask an Incel.
And we are expected to believe that SSM does not exist on the other side of the axis?
As somebody who is pro-life, my take-away is that one way to reduce the number of "unwanted pregnancies" is to attach a negative social-standing to people who engage in risky behaviors.
“As somebody who is pro-life, my take-away is that one way to reduce the number of "unwanted pregnancies" is to attach a negative social-standing to people who engage in risky behaviors.”
ReplyDeleteAgree. This used to be the case years ago. It is still the case in smaller towns and in communities outside the US. Historically one problem has been it has been a major negative for the woman but not as big of an issue for the man. If we can get both to see the value in keeping their body count low it will help. AIDS used to be a real concern when engaging in promiscuous behavior. Before modern drugs it was various strains of STD’s or a teen pregnancy. We have “solved “ many of these issues and removed barriers to promiscuous behavior. With it the social stigma has faded.
We need to return the to the classroom the videos of what a teen Mom goes through. And show what an irresponsible man has to also has to deal either of they get a girl pregnant. Also show what happens to the girl and her child if he walks away. Statistics are there and they need to be aware they can ruin two lives.
Ruin three lives, at a minimum. All of the other children the woman has after her first disappearing boyfriend will also be impacted.
Delete