It is my belief that Jesus frequently used recent local events as the springboard for many of his parables. It is a very reliable "hook" to engage listeners.
Perhaps the return of a shamed son had everybody's tongues wagging and that Jesus tweaked that event into the parable of the Prodigal Son to illustrate the benevolence of our heavenly Father. Perhaps there was a recent flash-flood in a local wadi that had washed indigent housing off of sandbars and that became the parable of building on rock.
Sometimes the parables may have been prompted by something as trivial as a songbird nesting in a tall weed growing beside a field or road.
In many cases, those moral stories were likely to have had their origins in concrete events that the listeners were aware of and triggered visceral reactions within them.
The workers in the vineyard
One parable that seems contrary-to-logic is the parable of the workers in the vineyard (Matt 20:1-16)
In the story, the owner of the vineyard goes to the village square and hires day-laborers to harvest his fruit. Then he goes again at lunch and hires more. Then again in mid-afternoon. At the end of the day he pays them all the same wages
What kind of situation would make that seem logical to the listeners?
Osmosis
Osmosis is a phenomena where water will permeate through a membrane and dilute the side with the more concentrated solution.
Suppose you had a membrane with pure water on one side and a solution with 25% sugar and 75% water on the other. The volume of the sugar-water will increase as water molecules migrate from the pure-water side to the sugar-water side.
That is why ripe cherries, tomatoes and grapes split after a rain. Once split, the crop is spoiled.
A storm is coming
It is almost a certainty that the people listening to Jesus knew of somebody who had lost their entire crop of grapes due to an untimely rainstorm.
If the owner of the vineyard had a sense that the weather was shifting, he would hire every day-laborer available. Since day-laborers might finish up a job mid-day a few might trickle back to the hiring place throughout the day.
Now suppose that the weather becomes increasingly threatening as the day progresses. The original laborers have been cutting the bunches of grapes and filling baskets which are scattered about the vineyard. Those grapes are just as vulnerable to splitting as the ones hanging on the vines. The owner tells the laborers to keep cutting bunches as he goes back to the village to get more laborers to carry the baskets to the pressing room.
Still, the thunderheads tower higher.
The owner goes back to the village to get even more workers, perhaps to run the presses and fill the fermentation vessels.
At the end of the day, the absence of any of the workers would have resulted in the loss of the crop. They would have rotted on the vine if they had not been picked. They would have rotted in the baskets within the vineyard if they had not been carried to the pressing house. They would have rotted in the pressing house if they had not immediately been pressed. In that sense, every worker was worth the same wages.
Harvest equals anxiety
Crops are usually increasingly vulnerable to losses as they approach harvest. Bugs, animals, humans, war, weather...they can all destroy next year's larder in a short period of time with weather like hail or heavy downpours being able to destroy ripe grapes in a matter of minutes.
Yes, I feel anxiety during harvest season. There are two ways to respond to anxiety: Double your efforts or go comatose. Of the two, increased effort is the more functional response.
If I were a betting man, I would bet that a local grape-grower had recently lost a bumper crop of grapes due to an untimely rainstorm or hailstorm a few weeks before Jesus shared the parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard.
And one of the unspoken undercurrents would be unknowable of sudden storms and other catastrophes. No man knows the day nor hour.
*Potatoes are the exception.
Great story and makes sense if you really want people's attention to the message, use local events to drive it home.
ReplyDeleteThis confused me though "*Potatoes are the exception. "
Please advise :-)
Strong winds will flatten fields of grain. Rain can make them mold. A battle fought in a field of ripe wheat will make it unharvestable.
DeleteA field full of mature potatoes will still be filled with good potatoes although prolonged flooding will make the rot and a direct hit by a hoof will ruin that one potato.
Spuds can sit in the ground for a couple months before harvest w/o problems.
DeleteAnd if you miss a few spuds at harvest , you might get some next spring as they come again as new plants .
ReplyDeleteThe later workers are needed from desperation. This causes the rate paid to workers to go up. Perhaps they all received the same amount of money but those laborers hired later in the process received a higher rate of pay. (I'll pay you $10/hr for 8 hours. Oops, Please help; I'll pay you $20/hr for 4 hours. Oh, no! I'll pay you $40/hr for 2 hours)
ReplyDeleteI may be missing it. I figured the parable didn't make sense to the hearer. Matt 13:13 "hearing they shall hear not."
ReplyDeleteThe workers in the vineyard : I believe Jesus was commenting that "your works" don't count toward salvation, because nothing you do is good enough for any one to 'earn' this great gift of knowing God and having relationship with Him. Yes we will benefit by doing good for others, but that is what we are supposed to do whether we are rewarded or not. e.g. The thief on the cross received eternal salvation only by believing in Jesus [at the last minute]. JoeRoy
DeleteIt certainly does make for a realistic background of what might have occurred. And might even lead to STxAR's point above, that people missed the point (God's forgiveness versus wages/hour).
ReplyDeleteGood sir, you have my gratitude and appreciation for your explanation of the parable. It is the best I have ever heard, and it makes sense. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI am often amazed at what I learn here. In another time and place you might have been a shaman or teacher. Your readers comments also are thought provoking. I am sure all over your various thoughts are based on personal experiences. I however have had different experiences. I imagined the workers were being paid say 50 cents a basket and all needed 4 dollars a day pay. Worker 1 picked only the very best grapes. Worker 2 selected only the bunches that looked ready. Worker 3 grabbed any bunch that got close to his hand and any other he could spy.
ReplyDeleteI think you are spot on with the grapes. That harvest had to be brought in that day. I've been taught that the parables had to resonate with the hearers. It was the "kingdom message" that wasn't heard by everyone.
ReplyDeleteThe other way to look at it is that no after wether we start following God from the cradle or find him later in life, maybe when you marry or finally accept him shortly before death we will all receive the same reward in heaven.
ReplyDeleteThat is the message that I get out of it.
DeleteThe Jews (at that time) believed in "generational guilt" and believed that they were God's only chosen-people. In that context, this parable can also be seen as a precursor of God opening up salvation to non-Jews.