![]() |
| Surprise! This mulberry graft is alive. |
I had to run some errands plus a few other commitments. While batting about Eaton County, I laid down my smartphone and walked away.
I was getting ready to fire up the mower when I started patting my pockets. No phone.
I checked all of the places in the house where I habitually "lose" my phone. No phone.
I asked Mrs ERJ to call my phone and I listened for the ring. No phone.
So...I retraced my steps.
I did get the mower with the new engine fired up. The motor smoked a little bit on start-up as it burned off the oil it had been sprayed with for corrosion protection. I pushed it about 150 feet. Stopped to move a hose and the blade was loose when I restarted it.
Obviously, I had not torqued the bolt sufficiently. I suspect that the engine break (a safety feature) is pretty aggressive. The blade had not been loose before I shut it down for the hose.
Since the mower was hot and I didn't want to mess with it, I grabbed the old mower and started mowing the orchard. I was able to get about an hour of mowing and cutting vines done before I bagged it for the day.
Vines
One of the thoughts I had while working in the orchard is that vines are an apt metaphor for our subsidized classes.
Vines are able to out-grow their hosts because they don't have to invest any energy into "structure" to hold themselves upright. They scramble up into tree canopies, holding themselves in place with tendrils or suckers, and then over-top their supports.
Ultimately, the trees lose vigor, die and topple, taking the vines with them.
Lack of access to house ownership seems to be a flashpoint for many of the people who have grievances.
It is my impression that many of those people-with-grievances have no idea regarding the range-and-scope of the hassles that can go along with home-ownership.
One young, kind-hearted lady that I know wanted to move in with her boyfriend so she leased out her house. The tenants kept asking for various types of maintenance be done and since she wanted to be a good landlord, she complied with speed. Since she was compassionate, she didn't choose the most economical materials because she didn't think that renters should have less "premium" materials that homeowners. Two years later, she decided that she had to sell the house because the expenses had exceeded the income by over $90k.
An extreme case? Perhaps. But if you are not "handy" and have connections with people in the trades, then a rental unit can quickly turn into a money-pit. So, knowing that, what is the most likely trajectory if renters are given a no-skin-in-the-game entry into home ownership?
Windfalls
One of Kubota's friends had a mother who won a "home make-over" in a contest. The house was gutted and fitted with premium fixtures and surfaces. It also raised the assessed value and more than doubled the property taxes.
So let me ask a simple question, "If the mother could not afford normal maintenance BEFORE the make-over, how will she be able to afford the maintenance on the grander house and be able to pay the higher taxes?"
Obviously, she couldn't. She got behind in her taxes. The house was trashed. So, she did what had worked before.
She approached the organization that had rehabbed it the first time and told them she needed another make-over so she could sell it.
There response was that their policy prevented them from going back. They didn't have enough resources and their sponsors had ZERO interest in "another last-chance" to anybody.











