AI generated video content
"We live on the cusp of history" sounds overly dramatic, but I believe it is warranted with regard to the overwhelming amounts of "fabricated" video content polluting streaming platforms.Who benefits?
Potentially, the legacy media outlets benefit because they can market themselves as only broadcasting "curated, vetted content". The problem with that is that the legacy networks have a history of creating (i.e. "fabricating") stories either for sensationalism or to forward an agenda.
One of the earliest documented cases involved a "hit-piece" on General Motors pickup trucks in 1992. Unlike earlier victims of hit-journalism, GM had the will and the resources to "push back".
The morning after the piece ran to a national audience, GM Legal called NBC and demanded to know where the pickup truck was so they could run their own forensic analysis. NBC told them "It has already been crushed."
That answer seemed too pat and too quick, so GM sent a team of crash investigators to the location where the "test" had been run and started visiting scrap-yards. The found the "crushed" pickup in one of the scrapyards about five miles away. It had not been crushed. They purchased the vehicle, put it on a flat-bed and transported it back to the GM Tech Center in Warren, Michigan.
They found out that the gas cap was not the factory-original cap but was some random, undersized cap that almost fit. It is not know if the producers had replaced the factory cap with one that guaranteed spillage. Regardless, that event is one of the reasons why gas-caps are now tethered to the vehicle. You cannot accidentally drive away from the gas station without it.
![]() |
| The cheap ink used to print information on the outside of the rocket cases had transferred to the modeling clay used to hold them in place. The printing was still legible. |
The found evidence that three Estes Rocket Motors had been affixed to the frame of the pickup with modeling clay and duct-tape. The rocket motors had been ignited shortly before the collision to ensure that any gas that spilled was ignited.
The producers of the segment over-filled the gas tank, literally filling it until gas was spilling out of the filler tube.
Finally, GM obtained video footage from the fire department that had been hired to perform Safety Over-watch during the taping of the event. I assume that the over-watch was required by the film crew's insurance carrier.
The fire department recording, when played at full speed showed that the entire flame-event lasting for five seconds with the big fire-ball lasting about 1.5 seconds. If you watched the NBC footage, you might have noticed that they went to slow-motion to prolong the fireball and then cut the feed as it started to die down. Then they kept replaying the short-lived gout of flame from other angles leading the viewer to believe that the fire lasted much, much longer than it did.
The Mainstream Media coverage of the January 6 demonstration ("insurrection") used the same video techniques to make the entry of the demonstrators into the Capital look like Santa Anna's 6000 Mexican soldiers storming the Alamo.
Not just NBC
It isn't just second-rate news sources like NBC that have been "nipped".
No less than National Geographic and BBC have been implicated in "pressuring" characters in the reality series "Life Below Zero" to perform dangerous stunts to increase viewership. Sue Aiken has been the most vocal about the pressure but Glen Villeneuve was also goaded into potentially life threatening situations. For example, Villeneuve was "coached" to swim a snow-melt fed river from inside-of-bend to outside-of-bend for drama. He almost didn't make it.
For those who are not in-the-know, find a wide spot in the river on a straight stretch. Wide means shallow. WADE across the river keeping your core body dry. Outsides of bends are treacherous for three reasons. The current will pull your lower body down due to the fluid dynamics, the bottom and shore are usually very steep AND finally, there are often tree roots and trash sticking out of the bottom that will snag your clothing or legs.
Summary
History suggests that the legacy media will not neutrally "curate and vet" content. They have their own biases and their profit incentives are not transparent.

Been going on in the Media for years....Look at the sensationalized bit from Rodney King that precipitated a 3 day riot.
ReplyDeleteSee also George Floyd in Social Media.
Lots of that stuff happening. And people believe it because it fits their Preconception Bias.
Truth matter less than FEELINGs now. It's part of the feminization of our society.
The term was coined by Adolph Hitler in his autobiography, Mein Kampf.
DeleteHitler wrote that “the great masses of the people… will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.”
He also claimed that if propagandists repeated a lie often enough, people would come to accept it.
No wonder we defeated the Nazis.
Hitler FEMINIZED them.
Lucky us.
B propaganda works perfectly well on BOTH SEXES.
I'll gladly retract that if you happen to have some links proving males are not so affected.
The obvious question would be: so, what then? Where do you get your news from?
ReplyDelete"Legacy media" is a large umbrella, but in general - established journalism institutions have systems in place to *mitigate* such issues. What responsibility does ZeroHedge have when it gets stories wrong or displays obvious bias?
Then there's the consumer - there's a responsibility for the everyday person to take into account discovered violations of integrity and hold their news sources accountable.
"Trust but verify" would be the recommendation. Ultimately it takes a plurality of sources and viewpoints to shape a proper conclusion. People think of 'facts' as the end-all. One should understand that a true 'fact' can lead to a false 'conclusion'. Experts in given fields can interpret 'facts' and come to the correct conclusion that might not be intuitive to someone without knowledge.
So, after rambling a bit - again: we've heard your criticism, what's your prescription?
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt for starters...
DeleteThe BBC has considerable 'form' in regard to manipulation: Martin Bashir and the Princess Diana interview, manipulation of the Jan 6th footage of Trump (currently subject of potential court action), their refusal to give any airtime to any person who challenges their "we're all doomed" climate narrative, etc.
ReplyDeleteAll news media has an 'agenda', one has to be aware of how this corrupts any objective reportage by any of the visual or print sources.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVdE8A-e4Do&list=RDZVdE8A-e4Do&start_radio=1&pp=ygUtZG9uIGhlbmxleSBkaXJ0eSBsYXVuZHJ5IG9mZmljaWFsIG11c2ljIHZpZGVvoAcB
ReplyDelete.
Weathermen on their knee's in a puddle?
ReplyDeleteThe latest 'take the cake' for me was the ukiestan footage of the overturned cars and mobs running through the debris in front of a church - with perfectly intact stained glass windows. Them's is tough winders.... Later witness footage revealed the camera crew coaching the 'refugees' how to run around the building and towards the camera...
You don't hate them enough. You really don't.
There are SO many... And yes, GM was the first to push back and call them out.
ReplyDeleteI remember a TV report wherein our intrepid journalist-in-the-field is braving horizontal rain driven by hurricane-force wind. In the background, we see a guy in short sleeves, shorts and sandals, nonchalantly wheeling a bicycle, clothing unruffled by any wind. Um...
ReplyDelete