It is commonly accepted in espionage tradecraft that there is actionable information embedded in even the most mundane of "enemy" communications.
From the Youtube transcript of Susan Rice podcast with Preet Bharara
Note: I cut-and-paste directly from the auto-generated, Youtube transcript without attempting to make it more readable. I did that to avoid accusations that I "spun" Susan Rice's words. My comments are at the bottom of this post.
My apologies for how difficult it is to read.
7:30
support them. You
know, I I wish we could muster that kind of energy with greater
frequency. But but when it comes
7:37
to the elites,
you know, the the the corporate interests, uh the law firms,
7:42
the universities,
the media, I agree with you, Pit, it it it is not uh it's
7:48
not going to end
well for them. For those that uh decided that it was, you know, that
they would act in their
7:55
perceived very
narrow self-interest, which I would underscore is very short-term
self-interest.
8:00
um and you know
take a knee to Trump. Um I think they're now starting to realize,
8:06
wait a minute, you
know, this is not popular. Trump is not popular. What he is doing, uh
whether on the economy and
8:14
affordability or on
immigration now is not popular. Uh and that there is likely
8:20
to be a swing in
the other direction. And they are going to be caught uh with
8:25
more than their
pants down. they're going to be held accountable um by uh
8:31
those who come uh
in opposition to Trump um and win at the ballot box. And I can
8:37
tell you PIT, you
know, as I talk to leaders in in uh in Washington, leaders
8:43
in our party,
leaders in the states, if these corporations think that the Democrats
uh when they come back in
8:49
power uh are
going to, you know, play by the old rules uh and um you know, and
8:57
and say, "Oh,
never mind. we'll we'll forgive you for all the people you've fired,
all the policies and and
9:03
principles you've
violated, all you know, the laws you've skirted. I think they've
got another thing coming
***
10:48
to that, there
will be an accountability agenda. You know, companies already uh are
are starting to hear they they
10:54
better preserve
their documents. They better be ready for subpoenas. If they've done
something wrong, they'll be
11:01
held accountable.
And if they um haven't broken the law, good for them. If
11:06
they've done the
right things, good for them. That also will be noted and and and
remembered. But you you know, this
11:13
is not going to
be uh a an instance of,
11:18
you know, for
forgive and forget. Um the damage that these people are doing is is
11:23
too severe to uh
the American people and to our national interest. on some of
11:29
these things that
strikes me and I hear totally hear what you're saying with respect to
some of the bending of the knee
11:35
people didn't
break the law they just caved and and and people are allowed to make
bad deals with so for example ABC
11:42
or CBS or other
media outlets who settled for a lot of money even though they had
very strong and meritorious um
11:50
defenses to a
defamation claim probably not something you can do there
11:55
in terms of um legal
violation and maybe can shine a light on it and have hearings to sort
of expose some of those
12:03
outlets. Is there
anything else you think can or should be done with respect to
12:09
the fourth estate
um giving Trump a blank check to intimidate them?
12:14
Well, careful
media media people are listening and watching. First of all, uh we we
ought to lift up
12:20
those that that
have not bent the knee and there are those. uh you know I think
12:26
the New York
Times and the Atlantic uh even the Wall Street Journal um
12:32
deserve uh you
know credit for for standing up um and uh and and among the
12:39
broadcast
networks you know NBC has taken a different approach than than CBS um
and so I think you know part of this
12:46
is consumers
voting with their their feet and their dollars um but it's also
12:51
to examine uh
what may lie behind the scenes. On the surface, it doesn't appear uh
that one could argue that
12:58
there that laws
were broken, but you know, some of the stuff that seems to be going
on at CBS is dubious at best. Um,
***
Reasonable speculation
The Democratic party is freaked-out by the evidence that their near-total control of the media is slipping away. While Rice identified several industries that would be punished, Mass Media is the only industry where Rice mentioned specific corporations as future targets.
Rice threatened CBS and ABC with lawfare. Even though the language is passive-third person, she put them on notice that the next Democratic POTUS DOJ will comb through all of the laws on the books to find something to throw at them even though she admits
"On the surface it doesn't appear that...laws
were broken"
If this was a horror movie, the media would be the vain-but-feckless roommate who discovers that her roommate is an ax-murderer.
Stay tuned! Does vain-but-feckless move out? Does she turn state's evidence? Or does she stay in denial "Oh, he is really not that bad" and drift toward the bloody-and-now-inevitable conclusion?