Peterforester commented on a recent post:
I actually read an article a while back about a guy who was buying up derelict houses in Detroit. The city was selling them for $1.00 apiece. He bought up several blocks of them. The he had them torn down. Then he returned the land to agricultural use.
Can it work?
Four minute video. To live in this planned community, you must commit to growing food on 1/2 of your "lot".
From the same channel. About five minutes long.
Can it work? Maybe. Historically, gardening in medium-to-low density urban areas was the norm. It was promoted as recently as WWII, particularly in Europe. It is still common in parts of China and Latin America.
Stumbling blocks
Theft and vandalism
The ethic of private property is not respected in many places. Gardens are difficult and expensive to armor against those threats. If/when people get hungry, they will steal the food or destroy it out of anger and spite. Theft and vandalism totally guts the incentive to cultivate a garden.
The places that are most likely to be food-deserts are also likely to have the poorest regard for the sanctity of private property.
Property ownership
Much of the housing in food-deserts is rental. Length of tenure is uncertain. There is little incentive to make property improvements (fences, soil amendments). There are likely to be clauses in leases that prohibit "eyesores" like compost piles.
Poor soil
Most cities started on fertile sites with geographic advantages like harbors or navigable rivers. Decades of excavation and earth-moving destroyed the topsoil. Much of what is left is polluted with heavy metals and long-lasting contaminates.
In older parts of cities, the drainage is compromised since the oldest, most-in-need of repair parts are where the urban expansion drains through. Detroit, specifically, was built on a flat, clay-pan that used to be the bottom of a prehistoric lake. "Flat" and "clay" do not drain well.
Some land was created by filling in tidal-flats. The fill rubble, foundry sand and other waste.
People choosing to use your garden as a toilet or to shoot-up drugs turns your garden into a biohazard.
The places that are most likely to be food-deserts are likely to have the worst soil for growing food.
Shade
Small lots means that a neighbor's tree or the apartment block next door will shade your garden. And there is nothing you can legally do about it.
Unrealistic expectations
Because the urban dweller who shops at Kroger sees fresh plums and cherries and strawberries in the produce department year-round, they expect their two trees and the bale of straw with five strawberries on it to do the same. They have a hard time comprehending that a tree full of sweet cherries has ripe cherries for about a week and if you want cherries for longer than that, you need to refrigerate the fifty pounds you might harvest.
They want to grow crops that have specialized requirements. They expect the produce to be cosmetically perfect. They cannot comprehend that the perfect carrot they buy in a bag was grown in deep, "muck" soils that only occur in very localized areas. Basically, muck is a drained peat bog.
Labor requirements
It is difficult for people who lived an urban existence their entire lives to comprehend the labor requirements involved in gardening on a large scale.
The needs of the plants determines what you do, not your To Do list.
Your hands will get dirty.
You will be bending over or on your knees. You are likely to get blisters on your hands. Slivers are a real possibility. Weeds and bugs can and will sting you.
Weeds. Watering. Harvesting. Storing dirty food somewhere. Cleaning. All that has to happen before you can start preparing a meal from-scratch, which in itself is seen as an accomplishment on-par with climbing Mount Everest by a portion of the population.
Restrictive rules
Unfortunately, "consensus" usually devolves to capitulation to the most unreasonable person in an effort to avoid conflict.
Even though pesticides and fertilizers are used liberally on lawns and public spaces everywhere, urban Karens go ballistic if they see anybody using "chemicals" near a vegetable garden. They insist that everybody be "organic".
They also throw a hissy-fit when you live-trap raccoons, possum, squirrels and other vermin and relocate them (after dispatching them in a private place).
They complain about bees.
They blame marigolds and zinnias for their hay-fever.
They complain about fences and sheds and other structures.
They complain about the untidy appearance of raspberry bushes and okra.
Pumpkins
For some reason, every new gardener wants to grow a crop of (ornamental) pumpkins. They are the bane of people managing community gardens.
The gardener thinks they throw some seeds into the ground in June and come back the week before October and that there will be 20 pumpkins to pick.
It NEVER works out that way. Their allotment becomes a weed-choked jungle. The weeds go to seed and make all of the surrounding allotments much more difficult to care for.
If the vines survive, they sprawl out into other allotments and cause strife. Attempts to reach the absent gardener are never answered. The other gardeners curse the pumpkin-farmer and keep chopping back the vines.
About August 15, after the vines set a crop of baby pumpkins, the vines are killed by squash borers. The absent pumpkin-farmer visits and accuses the other gardeners of killing his vines and he threatens legal action.
Summary
It is NOT impossible to grow food in cities but there are many road-blocks.
One of the prime-enablers would be to carve out something like an Enterprise Zone or the special treatment of railways* but for agriculture. I think it needs to include language that operations inside the zone be results-oriented rather than getting all tangled up in "process".
*Railroads are allowed to have their own police force just like Indian Reservations. Trespassing laws are actually were enforced with great vigor even by local enforcement.






.png)