Gary wrote in comments asking about "the business model" of old-time, general stores
Unlike modern stores where all of the merchandise is purchased at a corporate level and is funneled to the retail outlet through a network of warehouses, the old-style, general store functioned partially as its own "market-maker".
If you ever dabbled in "collectibles" then you have dealt with market-makers. Market-makers have two prices, the price you (the customer) will pay for an item and the price they are willing to pay you when you sell the collectible back to the market-maker. The difference between the two prices is called "the spread". The market-maker also appraises the quality of the item which can have a huge bearing on its value.
The old-time general store market-maker was the broker who provided an orderly market between the myriad of small producers/collectors of eggs, butter, strawberries, blackberries, poke-greens, firewood, asparagus, apples, live animals, furs....and the people who wished to purchase and consume those commodities and "buyers" outside of the community (canners, tanners, soap and glue makers).
Why not sell direct?
There was never enough time/labor to spare having somebody going door-to-door to find a buyer.
Even if a neighbor approached you and asked you to "save a few bushels of apples" for him to purchase directly, there still needed to be a mechanism for setting the price. And what if you saved him four bushels but he only wanted two? What do you do with the extra? What if the buyer says your apples were bad apples and didn't want to pay you? What if the buyer didn't have any cash or any produce that you wanted to trade for?
The small-town grocery store had enough traffic that SOMEBODY would buy those apples. And as the season went on, the store owner would dynamically adjust the price he offered growers so he would always make a profit selling to his retail buyers.
One way he would do that would be to look at "days-supply-of-inventory". If the item was perishable, he might stop buying when he knew there was any risk of getting "stuck" with the goods that would go-bad before he could sell them.
The shortage-of-cash issue was partially resolve by the store keeping books and crediting the merchandise they purchased against the bill the seller owed the store. This doesn't "create" money because somebody has to pay enough cash for the merchant to replenish his supplies purchased from "outside". But the crediting did make it possible for cash-strapped families to gain access to flour, salt, lard, beans, coffee and other items they could not produce on-farm.
It was also a way for school-aged kids (and pensioners and drunks) to participate in the economy and buy luxury items like shoes and fishing gear and .22 ammo, RC colas and Moonpies. They could pick blackberries, mushrooms, catch catfish, pick poke greens, sell mistletoe and collect returnable beverage containers.
Reader Dragonslayer observed "Don't farmers have large fields of soft dirt, equipment that digs large holes, and a constant need for fertilizer?"
The fact that the thief knew his way around a central-pivot rig suggests that the theft was an inside job.
If you, as the farmer, opted for the Three-S solution, how are you going to cope if you end up shooting your neighbor's kid or somebody who dated your daughter or even your own kid? Even if you are hardened enough to not feel emotional remorse, will you be able to keep your mouth shut for the rest of your life?
The Three-S solution can seem attractive when the details are abstract or we can fantasize that the perps are anonymous "sum dudes" from a far-away big city but the realities are often more complex and involved than that scenario. Even what appears to be a home invasion can be a case of your 40 year-old son getting kicked out by his old-lady...getting falling down drunk and then coming to your home in the middle of the night because he has no where else to go.
Student loans
19 separate loans! How many years did she go to school?
She said that she qualified for a repayment plan based on her income. Since interest rates were paused for two years due to Covid, then only 12 years accrued on the interest between 2011 and 2025. If her original loans were at 6% interest (which seems plausible) then the only way for the principle to have doubled in 12 years is if she never made a payment.
Was she in prison? Was she in a coma? Stranded on a desert island? Caring for a rich sugar-daddy? Living in her mama's basement and clubbing for 14 years? Maybe she never actually graduated so she could never get a job in her field.
She borrowed money. She didn't pay (hardly) any of it back. What did she expect to have happen?