Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Like trees, most of us increase in girth as we age

 

Source (UK data)

The main strength of the paper is the thorough (longitudinal) analysis of 273,843 BMI observations on 56,632 participants in studies spanning births between 1946–2001 and ages from 2–64 years. No other study has such extensive serial data covering such a wide range of ages and birth years. 

In terms of weaknesses, 

(1) it was not possible to model separate trajectories for overweight and obesity; 

(2) the trajectories were smoothed over age periods in which no sweep took place and thus did not capture local traits, such as a peak during puberty, for some studies; 

(3) we assume our findings are due to changes in adiposity more so than fat-free mass, but this might not always be the case [51,52]; and 

(4) by excluding non-white participants, we were not able to consider the extent to which secular trends in obesity might be driven by the changing ethnic composition of the UK...

The measurement protocols for weight and height were not consistent within and between-studies, which could have introduced bias if, for example, self-reported measurements were systemically under or over-reported. The tendency of people with greater BMIs to under-report weight suggests that our results are conservative

For a man of average stature, he becomes "overweight" at 169 pounds. For the average woman, she becomes "overweight" after she passes 143 pounds.

Those same individuals have to gain 34 and 29 pounds respectively to graduate from "overweight" to "obese".

In the 1946 (immediately after 10 years of economic depression and 6 years of World War, 1958 and 1970 Body Mass Indexes were virtually identical for 10 year-old children.

From age 10 and after, the boys/men gain weight decade-by-decade for the duration of the study.

In the 1946 study, women's BMI remains virtually unchanged until 1960 when those women are approximately 30 years old and then their weight slowly climbs.

The 1958 study shows women's BMI starting to creep upward starting at an age that is eight years sooner than the 1946 cohort.

The 1970 study shows women's weights starting their upward creep even sooner.

The 1991 and 2001 data show both boys and girls with approximately 10% more individuals in the overweight or obese categories. That is 2X the "floor" from the earlier studies.

The tabular data for the 1970 cohort shows 7% of 10 year-old boys, 18% of 20 year-old men, 52% of 30 year-old men and 67% of the 40 year-old men being overweight or obese. It also shows 12% of the 10 year-old girls, 16% of the 20 year-olds, 34% of the 30 year-olds and 49% of the 40 year-old women being overweight or obese.

12 comments:

  1. Obesity is a rich society's "problem". Most of the obese I see are "poor" folks buying groceries with their EBT cards.

    Our Poor are RICH compared to the vast majority of the world's population.

    Some not so happy news for energy and fertilizer:

    https://appalachianrenegade.com/2026/03/18/what-did-trump-expect/

    Proverbs 27: …11Be wise, my son, and bring joy to my heart, so that I can answer him who taunts me. 12The prudent see danger and take cover; but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. 13Take the garment of him who posts security for a stranger; get collateral if it is for a foreigner.…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, though there is a great deal of irony in there. Most of the 'skinny' people I know, are fabulously wealthy (err... compared to the average Joe). These are the 200K+ per year households. They eat organic, all natural, healthy meals, never snack on junk food, hardly consume alcohol.. If you didn't see their house or bank account, you'd think they were paupers.
      Conversely, those actually living hand-to-mouth, on the handouts from society, are invariably MORBIDLY obese! I don't just mean big-boned, I mean rolls of dough on-top of the love handles obese. Incapable of physical exertion, as they'd have a heart attack! Never eat whole foods - it has to come out of a plastic bag pre-cooked and be heated in a microwave, or they won't touch it! Those are the one's so poor they can't feed themselves.
      The inversion is probably telling us something...

      Delete
    2. Anon, that is by choice. When I was in college and on my own, I was dollar poor. To stretch my food dollar I ate rice and lots of raw vegetables that I cooked myself. Taking lesson from how most families did it way back when, I ate some kind of animal meat one meal per week. That was Sunday, the first day of the week. Very often that was fish I caught.

      Food stamps and other govt programs make it easy to remain poor. Poor in spirit but not in the EBT wallet.

      Delete
  2. Hmmm.....
    My experience is that even though my BMI is essentially the same as 40+ years ago (height and weight haven't changed), the distribution has changed. Middle age spread means a couple of inches on my waist, even though my weight hasn't changed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Standard warning: BMI is one measurement among many and is not necessarily indicative of obesity, as it fails to account for muscle mass. I have had multiple lifting and throwing friends who were "obese" by the book but were hardly unfit or out of shape.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I’m with TB. Just my anecdotal experience, but the local obits are chock full of fatties living into their late 70s and 80s, and skinnies kicking off in their 50s and 60s. My 63 year old brother is still running death races and has diabetes. I outweigh the USS Gerald Ford and I’m finer n’ frog hair. (Knock on wood). I think the biggest factor by far is genetics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To Glen's point, BMI is just one of many factors that contribute to health and longevity. Genetics really does play a part.

      Delete
  5. I have to agree with Toird, I'm heavier than I was in my 40s, no question. But I also remember one of my E-8s that was perennially on the 'fat boy' program because of BMI, even though he was diagnosed as big boned, at 6'4" and 245 lbs. He was also a weight lifter, and had a 38" waist... sigh

    ReplyDelete
  6. By senior year in HS, age 17, I weighed 180 and very muscular.
    At age 36 I weighed 215, Still could leg press 400+ and bench 335, but not so much muscle.
    That year I became obese. I became obese because some weenie govt cogs had changed the definitions.

    Notice the data never make distinction between body types or amount or muscle.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ditto, Rick. I lost weight due to a long term issue. I'm down to my high school weight. 180-185. I'm "overweight". Remember the pinch test? I pass that, but not the Baloney-Malarkey-Index. Wait.... I might pass that one too.... But not the .gov BMI.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It isn't as urgent as dismantling the medical-pharmaceutical industrial grifter complex, or removing junk food from SNAP, but perhaps RFK will get around to replacing BMI with body fat percentage some day.

    ReplyDelete

Readers who are willing to comment make this a better blog. Civil dialog is a valuable thing.