Monday, November 3, 2025

A quick look at New York City finances

For all practical purposes, New York City has 8 million residents.

Source
With 340,000 full-time municipal employees, that is one full-time employee for every 24 residents. The median employee salary is $88k. If the typical cost of benefits is 33% of base salary, then the total cost of compensation per employee is $117k or $4.9k per resident every year.

There are 167k pensioned retirees or almost exactly one retiree for every two full-time workers.

The pension fund is 90% funded (which is excellent for a public pension). 40% of the fund is invested in publicly traded equities (stock market), 10% in "private equity", 8% in real estate and 20% in quality bonds. The remainder is sprinkled over junk bonds and niche financial products. This asset allocation is similar to CALPER's and isn't widely out-of-line with conventional thinking.

The key-point is that the equities, junk bonds and real-estate are vulnerable to downturns that will impact the fund's ability to pay future benefits. 

A recent court ruling (note that judges are public employees) ruled that New York City must fully fund all healthcare costs for the plans that their retirees choose. 

Revenues

Approximately 30% of the city's revenue is from property taxes. Of that thirty percent, commercial property and multi-family (more than three unit) apartments make up about 40% of the property tax revenue each.

Approximately 37% of the revenue comes from a dog-breakfast of other taxes with personal and business income taxes being the largest pieces.

The last major category of revenue (about 25%) is from "grants" from the Federal government and from New York State.

Sensitivities

On the expenses side, due to activist judiciary rulings the cost of employees and retirees is a fixed cost.

Surprisingly, the carrying cost of debt is only 4% of the budget.

San Francisco office space went from a retail value of $1000/square-foot 2020-2022 to $400/square-foot. Drops in valuation force drops in property-tax revenues. If we assume 400,000 public defecations during that period, that is the loss of $4,200 in property value per dump. One shopping mall reports 93% vacancy rate.

On the revenue side, commercial real estate, especially the valuation of office space, is exquisitely sensitive to business environment. Small increases in vacancy rates give tenants leverage to negotiating rent or options to migrate to lower-rent office space.

Additionally, publicly traded companies have a fiduciary responsibility to be very protective of cash-flow. Financial officers have a legal obligation to negotiate rent and investigate lower-cost alternatives. 

A graphic example of what happens to prices when demand collapses

Unfortunately for New York City (and San Francisco), once people start questioning the absolute necessity of having a business presence in a "special" location, there is no stuffing the toothpaste back into the tube.

The ripple-effect does not favor NYC. Loss of revenue lowers credit ratings which raises the cost of servicing the debt. Higher-income workers flee. The attitude of municipal employees tanks.

As the probability of bankruptcy becomes more likely, rolling-over bonds becomes much more difficult. The Detroit bankruptcy resulted in employees being "made whole" and people who had Detroit City bonds getting zero. That was not in alignment with previous bankruptcy precedence but it is now the new standard.

A likely path to "Reorganization" would be accelerating erosion of NYC's financial condition and then, suddenly, an inability to roll a loan over. Unable to pay the principle, the city will be forced to seek protection in the courts. A classic case of brittle-failure. 

14 comments:

  1. The math is clear as a bell, and Mamdani is equally open about his intentions once achieving office. As a former resident of WNY, I cannot WAIT to see that God Forsaken patch of dirt implode on itself, the miscreants and weird-o's that inhabit it can go pound sand (and that's as polite as it's going to get). Literally the largest reason I left living in the other side of that state was NYFC's impact on everything. Hint: Hochul will bail them out when they go tit's up, too, at the expense of every other tax-payer in NY that has less-than-zero interest in the concrete shithole.
    The bifurcation of our society is advancing according to plan....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only problem I see with NYC going TU is that the residents may want to move to my area and begin telling us how we should do it (whatever) like they did it in NYC .obviously not having learned anything from the NYC co;;apse.

      Delete
  2. You've described the tax equivalent of the Holodomor. Where instead of stealing food from the farmers that grow it, thus starving them to death, you snuff out the businesses and families that pay taxes.

    The City will TAKE from the state and federal government to "make its self-whole". Damn the "collateral damage" as one soul likes to say.

    It's things like this that makes me SHUDDER when folks say "Let NYC go to hell with the commie-Muzzi.

    Snip The Port of New York & New Jersey is recognized as the busiest and largest seaport on the U.S. East Coast, playing a central role as a key shipping hub for international trade and global supply chains. Managed by the Port Authority, the port serves as a critical entry point for goods moving between North America and major global markets, supporting both imports and exports.

    Located in the Upper New York Bay and the New York Harbor, this fully mobilized port facility connects to major inland markets through advanced road, rail, and maritime networks.

    Some 2.7 Trillion dollars worth of America's GDP flows through this port.

    No wonder that Union strike threats are quickly resolved. Quite a economic lever as the demoncrats (spelling intentional) are STILL Using against Trump over EBT and such.

    Now just give it to the radicals and watch the "Fun".

    We be in trouble. This might be the famed straw that breaks the American Dollar as world reserve currency.

    I wish Joe would apply his research and writing skillset to explain what happened when formerly Great Britian's Pound lost its world reserve currency.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So your argument is to bail them out? No consequences for decades mismanagement? The burden is thrust onto an unwilling population that gets no say in the matter?
      Respectfully, and I say this knowing you feel exactly the same way, I see that attitude as the problem in this country. And truly, I totally get that we hold polar opposite viewpoints. I do actually see your point about the grander economy, etc., and do not discount the impacts it might have, that you point out. I concede the point is logical and valid IMO. So for mental masturbation, what should be done to curb the irresponsible behaviour of NYC's elected leaders (or are they left to continue on this road)? Should the rest of the country be forced to support them, again, w/o a say in the matter?
      The issue at the core is the same facing the entire nation. It takes many labels, I hesitate to name one, but this is a fractal of the larger debate taking place across a variety of issues plaguing our nation. To my mind, it all hinges on responsibility, accepting it or passing on it, but that's just one wingnut's opinion.

      Delete
    2. Did you miss my "we're in trouble " part near the end of my post?

      We have a dysfunctional at best "government " run by 500 plus thieving temple monkeys grabbing whatever they can steal from the flames they created.

      While I can masterbate on the keyboard as well as anybody I'm pretty sure I'm not in the decision loop of changing the obvious bad governance of my beloved country.

      Michael

      Delete
    3. Right, no solutions offered, just going to shoot down whats offered.
      Thanks for your help!

      Delete
  3. Not sure how it will all end. Hate to see October 29th, 1929 again. 100th anniversary of that event is four years out now.

    Order tends towards disorder. First rule of thermo dynamics. looks like it is holding true.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Been there, done that. NYC had to accept total Emergency Financial Control Board (EFCB) control over their finances in 1975 when this scenario played out then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If we had a functioning government that would be a workable plan.

      Two thirds of our temple monkeys would scream Dictator and government overreach and dozens of Obama installed "Judges " would rule against it that afternoon.

      We be screwed friends.

      Michael

      Delete
  5. The die is cast. America has gone to far down the cloward piven road to turn around. At this point, all we can do is prepare for what's coming. Skills, supplies and resources are the new reserve currency.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is quite likely that, given the most likely outcome of the upcoming mayoral election, companies will find reasons to relocate. Followed by high value individuals. Next year's tax revenue will not reflect that change, but future ones will.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Serious question Joe - not trying to be a dink: how accurate is your data? If the denizens of NYFC gave me a spreadsheet… I wouldn’t wipe my arse with it.

    If Elon and Big Balls signed off on it… then I *might* trust the data…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Accountants who put out annual reports are OCD. Because BIG MONEY is buying and selling muni-bonds, there are audits and third-party sign-offs.

      The only people who buy muni-bonds are people with very high marginal income-tax rates. Muni-bonds get favorable tax treatment which is one of the less-obvious subsidies cities are given. That favorable tax treatment isn't much good to those of us at lower marginal tax rates. The reason I bring it up is that those very high marginal tax-rate individuals have professionals bird-dogging their investments and as soon as there is a whiff of a possible bankruptcy they will sell those investments.

      The squishy parts of the data are things like "funding level" of pension funds where they have to assume some rate of return and estimates of future expenditures.

      Another squishy part is how quickly property assessors will mark property tax-basis down to market. They have negative incentive to do that since they want to believe that depressed property values are just random excursions and they will regress back to the mean.

      Delete
  8. "400,000 public defecations" - that is a load of cr4p to deal with. couldn't resist.

    ReplyDelete

Readers who are willing to comment make this a better blog. Civil dialog is a valuable thing.